The First Council of Nicaea
Canon X
Those who lapsed and were then ordained are to be deposed when it is discovered, whether or not the ordainers knew.
Read aloud. Your browser speaks the page using the voices installed on this device. Nothing is uploaded — the text never leaves your computer. Voice quality varies by browser and device.
Canon X — conciliar text
If any who have lapsed have been ordained through the ignorance, or even with the previous knowledge of the ordainers, this shall not prejudice the canon of the Church; for when they are discovered they shall be deposed.
Henry R. Percival (ed.), The Seven Ecumenical Councils of the Undivided Church, Nicene and Post-Nicene Fathers, Second Series, Vol. XIV (New York: Charles Scribner's Sons, 1900). Public domain.
Ancient Epitome, as printed in the same edition
Whoso had lapsed are to be deposed whether those who ordained and promoted them did so conscious of their guilt or unknowing of it.
A Byzantine-era summary carried in the canonical collections. It is a witness to how the canon was read, not the canon itself.
Plain-language summary — this project's words, not the canon's
If any who lapsed have been ordained, whether the ordainers knew of it or not, this does not prejudice the canon of the Church: when they are discovered they are to be deposed.
The fourth-century problem
After the persecutions, men who had sacrificed or bought certificates were in some cases ordained, sometimes because the fact was concealed and sometimes because it was overlooked.
The canon settles the question without needing to establish anyone's motive: the ordainer's knowledge does not change the outcome.
Canonical principle
The Church's rule is not suspended by the good faith of those who broke it. That is a hard principle and it is stated without softening.
It is worth noting what the canon does not do: it does not exclude the lapsed from communion, and the canons that follow provide for their restoration as laypeople. It excludes them from the clergy.
What kind of canon this is
- disciplinary
Percival's edition groups the Nicene canons without formal classification. The kinds named above are this project's analysis, offered so that a reader can see which parts of a canon are principle and which are the arrangement of a particular century.
Later interpretation and reception
This belongs with canons XI, XII and XIV on the lapsed, and with canons II and IX on ordination. Together they show a council working through a single crisis — the aftermath of persecution — from several directions.
The distinction between restoration to communion and eligibility for ordination, which this canon assumes, remains part of Orthodox canonical practice.
Related canons
- Canon IX, on ordination without examination.
- Canon XI, on the lapsed.
Related in this archive
-
The First Council of Nicaea
The council that confessed the Son to be of one substance with the Father, addressed the date of Pascha, and issued twenty disciplinary canons. It did not decide which books belong to the Bible.
-
Repentance
From the ancient penitential stations to the sacrament of confession as it is practised now.
-
The twenty canons of Nicaea: an overview
What the first council actually legislated about, in one pass, before you read them one by one.
Your notes
Sources for this page
- Tier C The Seven Ecumenical Councils of the Undivided Church Canon X of Nicaea annotated edition of conciliar texts The conciliar text as archived here. Source record (opens in a new tab)
- Tier C The Seven Ecumenical Councils of the Undivided Church Ancient Epitome of Canon X, with Percival's notes annotated edition of conciliar texts Nineteenth-century editorial apparatus and Byzantine canonists. Source record (opens in a new tab)
Tiers are explained in the methodology. No page on this site has been reviewed or approved by any bishop, priest, synod or seminary.