Canonised Father of the Church

John of Damascus

Also known as John Damascene; Yuhanna ibn Mansur ibn Sarjun

The last of the Greek Fathers commonly so counted: a monk under Muslim rule who wrote the classic defence of holy images and the first systematic summary of Orthodox doctrine.

Read aloud. Your browser speaks the page using the voices installed on this device. Nothing is uploaded — the text never leaves your computer. Voice quality varies by browser and device.

Dates
around 675 - around 749 — Both dates approximate. He lived and died outside the Byzantine empire, under the Umayyad caliphate.
Region
Damascus, then the monastery of Mar Saba near Jerusalem
Language of composition
Greek, Arabic
Commemoration
4 December (Orthodox Church in America and other Orthodox jurisdictions) — Julian-calendar jurisdictions observe the date thirteen days later on the civil calendar.

Life

John came from a Christian family that had served in the administration of Damascus before and after the Muslim conquest, and he appears to have held office himself before becoming a monk at Mar Saba near Jerusalem.

That he lived outside the Byzantine empire mattered. He wrote against imperial iconoclasm without being subject to the emperor who was enforcing it — one of the rare cases in this period where the reach of the state and the reach of the argument did not coincide. The iconoclast council of 754 anathematised him by name.

Works

Generally accepted as authentic

  • The Fount of Knowledge, including the Exposition of the Orthodox Faith — Not archived here.
  • Three Apologies against those who attack the divine images — Not archived here.
  • Hymnography — Including material used in the Paschal services. Attributions vary in reliability.

Disputed, spurious or lost

  • Barlaam and Ioasaph — A Christianised version of a legend of the Buddha, long transmitted under his name and generally no longer attributed to him.

Theological and spiritual contribution

John's argument for images rests on the incarnation. In the old covenant God had not been seen and could not be depicted; now the invisible God has been seen in the flesh, and what has been seen may be depicted. To refuse the image is to be uneasy about the reality of the flesh.

He made the distinction the Seventh Council would use, between the relative honour given to an image, which passes to the one depicted, and the worship due to God alone. That distinction is what makes it possible to say what Orthodox Christians are and are not doing before an icon.

The Exposition of the Orthodox Faith gathers the doctrine of the preceding Fathers into a single ordered summary. It became the standard handbook in the East and was translated into Latin in the twelfth century, where it influenced Western scholastic theology.

  • The Second Council of Nicaea

    The council that restored the veneration of holy images and distinguished the honour given to an icon from the worship due to God alone. It also issued twenty-two disciplinary canons.

    Council

  • Holy icons

    The image, the incarnation, and the difference between veneration and worship.

    Theme

  • Holy icons and the Seventh Council

    The image, the incarnation, and a controversy that lasted more than a century.

    Lesson

Your notes

Stored in this browser only. Never uploaded, never visible to anyone else, and marked as your own words if you add this page to a study packet.

Sources for this page

  1. Tier C The Seven Ecumenical Councils of the Undivided Church Henry R. Percival (ed.); Philip Schaff and Henry Wace (series eds.) The Decree of the Holy, Great, Ecumenical Synod, the Second of Nice annotated edition of conciliar texts Source record (opens in a new tab)
  2. Tier C The Seven Ecumenical Councils of the Undivided Church Henry R. Percival (ed.); Philip Schaff and Henry Wace (series eds.) Epitome of the Definition of the Iconoclastic Conciliabulum held in Constantinople, 754 annotated edition of conciliar texts The council that anathematised him by name. Source record (opens in a new tab)

Tiers are explained in the methodology. No page on this site has been reviewed or approved by any bishop, priest, synod or seminary.