Canonised Father of the Church
Maximus the Confessor
The theologian of Christ's two wills, mutilated and exiled for refusing an imperial formula, and vindicated by the Sixth Ecumenical Council nineteen years after his death.
Read aloud. Your browser speaks the page using the voices installed on this device. Nothing is uploaded — the text never leaves your computer. Voice quality varies by browser and device.
- Dates
- around 580 - 662 — Died on 13 August 662 in exile in Lazica. His early life is told in competing Greek and Syriac accounts that disagree substantially.
- Region
- Constantinople, North Africa, Rome, exile in Lazica
- Language of composition
- Greek
- Commemoration
- 21 January, and 13 August (Orthodox Church in America and other Orthodox jurisdictions) — Julian-calendar jurisdictions observe these dates thirteen days later on the civil calendar.
Life
Maximus was, on the Greek account, a Constantinopolitan aristocrat and imperial secretary who became a monk; a Syriac account, written by an opponent, gives a very different origin in Palestine. Historians disagree on which to prefer, and this page does not choose.
He left for North Africa ahead of the Persian and then Arab advance, and became the leading opponent of the monothelite formulas the emperors were promoting. He supported the Lateran Synod of 649 at Rome, which condemned them.
He was arrested, tried, and — on the account that has come down to us — had his tongue and right hand cut off, to stop him speaking and writing. He died in exile in 662. The Sixth Ecumenical Council confessed his position in 681.
Works
Generally accepted as authentic
- Ambigua; Questions to Thalassius —
- Four Hundred Chapters on Love —
- The Mystagogy —
- Opuscula on the two wills —
Theological and spiritual contribution
Maximus's decisive argument is that will belongs to nature, not to person. If Christ has two natures, he has two natural wills; a Christ with only a divine will would have an incomplete humanity, and an incomplete humanity would leave human willing unhealed. The argument follows directly from Gregory the Theologian's principle that what is not assumed is not healed.
He also distinguished between the natural will — the created drive toward the good — and the deliberative will that chooses between options under uncertainty. Christ has the first; the second, as we exercise it, belongs to fallen willing.
Beyond Christology, his synthesis of cosmology, asceticism and liturgy is one of the great achievements of Byzantine theology, and the Mystagogy shaped how the Orthodox tradition reads the Divine Liturgy.
Controversy and reception
Maximus was condemned by the Church's own institutional authorities of the day and vindicated by a later council. That sequence is worth sitting with: it shows that the Church's reception of the truth is not the same as the judgement of whoever currently holds power, and that the interval between them can consume a life.
Related in this archive
-
The Third Council of Constantinople
The council that confessed two natural wills and two natural operations in Christ, against monothelitism. It also condemned a bishop of Rome by name, which has been discussed ever since.
-
Gregory the Theologian
One of only three figures the Orthodox Church calls the Theologian, whose five orations on the Trinity settled how the Church would speak of God, and who resigned the see of Constantinople rather than prolong a quarrel.
-
Jesus Christ, God and man
One person in two natures: the four councils that worked it out and the four adverbs that guard it.
-
Orthodox worship
Vespers, Matins, the Divine Liturgy, and the year that shapes them.
Your notes
Sources for this page
- Tier C The Seven Ecumenical Councils of the Undivided Church The Third Council of Constantinople: The Definition of Faith annotated edition of conciliar texts The confession of two natural wills. Source record (opens in a new tab)
- Tier C The Seven Ecumenical Councils of the Undivided Church The Sentence Against the Monothelites, Session XIII annotated edition of conciliar texts Source record (opens in a new tab)
Tiers are explained in the methodology. No page on this site has been reviewed or approved by any bishop, priest, synod or seminary.