Canonised Father of the Church

Vincent of Lérins

Also known as Vincentius Lirinensis

A monk of the island monastery of Lérins whose Commonitory asks how a Christian can tell the Church's faith from novelty, and answers with a rule that has been quoted, and misquoted, ever since.

Read aloud. Your browser speaks the page using the voices installed on this device. Nothing is uploaded — the text never leaves your computer. Voice quality varies by browser and device.

Dates
died before 450 — Almost nothing is known of his life. The Commonitory dates itself to about three years after the Council of Ephesus.
Region
Gaul
Language of composition
Latin
Commemoration
24 May (Western commemoration) — His commemoration in Orthodox calendars is not uniform; this project has not been able to confirm it from an official Orthodox source.

Life

Vincent was a monk of Lérins, an island monastery off the coast of Provence that produced a remarkable number of fifth-century bishops. Beyond that, almost nothing about him is known; he wrote under a pseudonym and gave few details.

Works

Generally accepted as authentic

Disputed, spurious or lost

  • The Objectiones Vincentianae — A set of objections to Augustine's teaching on grace, attributed to a Vincent who may or may not be this one.

Theological and spiritual contribution

Vincent's question is practical: heretics quote Scripture too, so how does an ordinary Christian tell the Church's faith from a clever novelty? His answer is the rule of universality, antiquity and consent — hold what has been believed everywhere, always, and by all.

The rule is often quoted as though it were a formula that could be applied mechanically, which it cannot: nothing has literally been believed by every Christian in every place at every time, and Vincent knew it. He immediately qualifies it, and later in the Commonitory he allows for genuine growth in understanding — provided the thing that grows remains the same thing, as a body grows without becoming a different body.

Read whole, the Commonitory is a subtler book than its most famous sentence suggests, and it is one of the clearest ancient statements of how tradition and development relate.

Controversy and reception

In their own words

Every quotation below was located in the archived text of the edition named, at the locator given, by the build's own quotation check.

Moreover, in the Catholic Church itself, all possible care must be taken, that we hold that faith which has been believed everywhere, always, by all.

A Commonitory, Chapter II.6 Nicene and Post-Nicene Fathers, Second Series, Vol. XI, trans. C. A. Heurtley — public domain Read this work in the archive

This rule we shall observe if we follow universality, antiquity, consent.

A Commonitory, Chapter II.6 Nicene and Post-Nicene Fathers, Second Series, Vol. XI, trans. C. A. Heurtley — public domain Read this work in the archive
  • Scripture and Holy Tradition

    Not two sources of information, but one life in which Scripture is read.

    Theme

  • Scripture within Holy Tradition

    Not two sources of information, but one life in which the Scriptures are read.

    Lesson

  • Irenaeus of Lyons

    Bishop in Gaul who had heard Polycarp as a boy; the first great theologian of Tradition, of the fourfold Gospel, and of salvation as the recapitulation of all things in Christ.

    Father or writer

Your notes

Stored in this browser only. Never uploaded, never visible to anyone else, and marked as your own words if you add this page to a study packet.

Sources for this page

  1. Tier C Sulpitius Severus, Vincent of Lérins, John Cassian Philip Schaff and Henry Wace (eds.) A Commonitory, Chapter II translated edition of primary texts The rule of universality, antiquity and consent. Source record (opens in a new tab)
  2. Tier C Sulpitius Severus, Vincent of Lérins, John Cassian Philip Schaff and Henry Wace (eds.) A Commonitory, Chapter XXIII translated edition of primary texts On growth in understanding that remains the same faith. Source record (opens in a new tab)

Tiers are explained in the methodology. No page on this site has been reviewed or approved by any bishop, priest, synod or seminary.